Matt

I hope the following two references pull it together for you:

---

z/OS Communications Server, IP System Administrator's Commands, Version 1 
Release 12, SC31-8781-10

-

3.1.6.20 Netstat ROUTe/-r report

...

Report field descriptions 

...

Gateway or Gw

The gateway used to send packets to the destination. If the value is 0.0.0.0 
for an IPv4 entry or :: for an IPv6 entry, then the destination is directly 
reachable without needing to go through a gateway.

---

z/OS Communications Server, IP Configuration Reference, Version 1 Release 
12, SC31-8776-18

-

2.9 BEGINROUTES statement

...

   Route Entry:
      
<_________________________________________________________________
________________________ 
                                                                                
  <___________  |
   |____ROUTE__| Destination |__ _gateway_addr_ __interface_name__| 
PacketSize |___ _________ 
|_|________________________________________|
                                |_=____________|                                
   
|_Options_|


...

gateway_addr

The host IPv4 or IPv6 address of a gateway or router that you can reach 
directly, and that forwards packets for the destination network or host.

Requirement: This value must be either a fully qualified address or an equal 
sign (=), meaning that the messages are routed directly to destinations on 
that network or directly to that host. The equal sign is not supported for 
DEFAULT or DEFAULT6 route entries. 

---

Incidentally your "/32" routing table entries are contained within the "/24" 
routing table entries and are hence redundant.

It may be that the first "/32" entry is from an ICMP redirect.

Also it's not evident how the router interface address 27.1.1.5 can be 
reached. It may be sensible if you post your configuration so that we can 
propose a more usual structure for your routing table entries.

Chris Mason

On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:24:08 -0400, Dazzo, Matt <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>Cross post from IBMTCP-L
>
>Finally working on converting gateway to beginroutes format. I took some 
advice to from the archives and used the 'netstat routes report' command to 
create the basis of my conversion.  Below is a short segment of the routes 
report, not sure how to handle the statements with 0.0.0.0 as gateway. 
Would the following statements be converted correctly? Thanks Matt
>
>netstat routes report segment
>Destination         Gateway         Interfa
> -----------         -------         -----
>Defaultnet          27.1.1.5         GIGA0
>10.30.1.0/32        10.30.1.22       OSA40
>10.30.1.0/24        0.0.0.0          OSA40
>10.30.1.2/32        0.0.0.0          OSA40
>10.30.2.0/24        0.0.0.0          OSA41
>10.30.2.2/32        0.0.0.0          OSA41
>
>
>
>BEGINRoutes
>ROUTE DEFAULT         27.1.1.5 GIGA0 MTU 8992
>ROUTE 10.30.1.0/32  10.30.1.22    OSA40 MTU 8992
>ROUTE 10.30.1.0/24              =  OSA40 MTU 8992
>ROUTE 10.30.1.2/32              =  OSA40 MTU 8992
>ROUTE 10.30.2.0/24              =  OSA41 MTU 8992
>ROUTE 10.30.2.2/32              =  OSA41 MTU 8992

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to