Chris, mind if we take this offline. I can then send the table as an attachment, might be easier to read.
Tks Matt -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Mason Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 11:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Beginroutes Statement Matt I hope the following two references pull it together for you: --- z/OS Communications Server, IP System Administrator's Commands, Version 1 Release 12, SC31-8781-10 - 3.1.6.20 Netstat ROUTe/-r report ... Report field descriptions ... Gateway or Gw The gateway used to send packets to the destination. If the value is 0.0.0.0 for an IPv4 entry or :: for an IPv6 entry, then the destination is directly reachable without needing to go through a gateway. --- z/OS Communications Server, IP Configuration Reference, Version 1 Release 12, SC31-8776-18 - 2.9 BEGINROUTES statement ... Route Entry: <_________________________________________________________________ ________________________ <___________ | |____ROUTE__| Destination |__ _gateway_addr_ __interface_name__| PacketSize |___ _________ |_|________________________________________| |_=____________| |_Options_| ... gateway_addr The host IPv4 or IPv6 address of a gateway or router that you can reach directly, and that forwards packets for the destination network or host. Requirement: This value must be either a fully qualified address or an equal sign (=), meaning that the messages are routed directly to destinations on that network or directly to that host. The equal sign is not supported for DEFAULT or DEFAULT6 route entries. --- Incidentally your "/32" routing table entries are contained within the "/24" routing table entries and are hence redundant. It may be that the first "/32" entry is from an ICMP redirect. Also it's not evident how the router interface address 27.1.1.5 can be reached. It may be sensible if you post your configuration so that we can propose a more usual structure for your routing table entries. Chris Mason On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:24:08 -0400, Dazzo, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: >Cross post from IBMTCP-L > >Finally working on converting gateway to beginroutes format. I took some advice to from the archives and used the 'netstat routes report' command to create the basis of my conversion. Below is a short segment of the routes report, not sure how to handle the statements with 0.0.0.0 as gateway. Would the following statements be converted correctly? Thanks Matt > >netstat routes report segment >Destination Gateway Interfa > ----------- ------- ----- >Defaultnet 27.1.1.5 GIGA0 >10.30.1.0/32 10.30.1.22 OSA40 >10.30.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 OSA40 >10.30.1.2/32 0.0.0.0 OSA40 >10.30.2.0/24 0.0.0.0 OSA41 >10.30.2.2/32 0.0.0.0 OSA41 > > > >BEGINRoutes >ROUTE DEFAULT 27.1.1.5 GIGA0 MTU 8992 >ROUTE 10.30.1.0/32 10.30.1.22 OSA40 MTU 8992 >ROUTE 10.30.1.0/24 = OSA40 MTU 8992 >ROUTE 10.30.1.2/32 = OSA40 MTU 8992 >ROUTE 10.30.2.0/24 = OSA41 MTU 8992 >ROUTE 10.30.2.2/32 = OSA41 MTU 8992 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
