Matt

Go ahead. I/you/we can try to put any useful conclusions online for the 
archives.

Chris Mason - [email protected]

On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:58:48 -0400, Dazzo, Matt <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>Chris, mind if we take this offline. I can then send the table as an 
attachment, might be easier to read.
>
>Tks Matt
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Chris Mason
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 11:59 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Beginroutes Statement
>
>Matt
>
>I hope the following two references pull it together for you:
>
>---
>
>z/OS Communications Server, IP System Administrator's Commands, Version 1
>Release 12, SC31-8781-10
>
>-
>
>3.1.6.20 Netstat ROUTe/-r report
>
>...
>
>Report field descriptions
>
>...
>
>Gateway or Gw
>
>The gateway used to send packets to the destination. If the value is 0.0.0.0
>for an IPv4 entry or :: for an IPv6 entry, then the destination is directly
>reachable without needing to go through a gateway.
>
>---
>
>z/OS Communications Server, IP Configuration Reference, Version 1 Release
>12, SC31-8776-18
>
>-
>
>2.9 BEGINROUTES statement
>
>...
>
>   Route Entry:
>
><________________________________________________________________
_
>________________________
>                                                                               
>    <___________  
|
>   |____ROUTE__| Destination |__ _gateway_addr_ __interface_name__|
>PacketSize |___ _________
>|_|________________________________________|
>                                |_=____________|
>|_Options_|
>
>
>...
>
>gateway_addr
>
>The host IPv4 or IPv6 address of a gateway or router that you can reach
>directly, and that forwards packets for the destination network or host.
>
>Requirement: This value must be either a fully qualified address or an equal
>sign (=), meaning that the messages are routed directly to destinations on
>that network or directly to that host. The equal sign is not supported for
>DEFAULT or DEFAULT6 route entries.
>
>---
>
>Incidentally your "/32" routing table entries are contained within the "/24"
>routing table entries and are hence redundant.
>
>It may be that the first "/32" entry is from an ICMP redirect.
>
>Also it's not evident how the router interface address 27.1.1.5 can be
>reached. It may be sensible if you post your configuration so that we can
>propose a more usual structure for your routing table entries.
>
>Chris Mason
>
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:24:08 -0400, Dazzo, Matt <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>Cross post from IBMTCP-L
>>
>>Finally working on converting gateway to beginroutes format. I took some
>advice to from the archives and used the 'netstat routes report' command to
>create the basis of my conversion.  Below is a short segment of the routes
>report, not sure how to handle the statements with 0.0.0.0 as gateway.
>Would the following statements be converted correctly? Thanks Matt
>>
>>netstat routes report segment
>>Destination         Gateway         Interfa
>> -----------         -------         -----
>>Defaultnet          27.1.1.5         GIGA0
>>10.30.1.0/32        10.30.1.22       OSA40
>>10.30.1.0/24        0.0.0.0          OSA40
>>10.30.1.2/32        0.0.0.0          OSA40
>>10.30.2.0/24        0.0.0.0          OSA41
>>10.30.2.2/32        0.0.0.0          OSA41
>>
>>
>>
>>BEGINRoutes
>>ROUTE DEFAULT         27.1.1.5 GIGA0 MTU 8992
>>ROUTE 10.30.1.0/32  10.30.1.22    OSA40 MTU 8992
>>ROUTE 10.30.1.0/24              =  OSA40 MTU 8992
>>ROUTE 10.30.1.2/32              =  OSA40 MTU 8992
>>ROUTE 10.30.2.0/24              =  OSA41 MTU 8992
>>ROUTE 10.30.2.2/32              =  OSA41 MTU 8992

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to