Or find the place in IBM's code where the test is made and zap it so the comparison will always be equal. And then see what the results are (ugly, maybe?). Or try it with a 27-year old MVS/XA version of IPLTEXT.
Speaking of business cases, I believe that IBM has already made a good business case as to why they do it the way they do it now, which implies they will not change it. Bill Fairchild Rocket Software -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 11:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IPLTEXT and NUCLEUS dates >I still have to ask the question as to why is the IPL text release sensitive. Because it is? If that's the way IBM has designed it, live with it. They've already documented, so what is the problem? It is what it is. - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation! Kimota! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
