On 5/2/2011 9:11 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2011 09:25:51 -0400, Chicklon, Thomas wrote:

OK, you win. USS is officially only to be used when speaking of VTAM's
table thing.

So, if you (and some others I'm sure) want to preserve the purity of the
acronym USS, good for you. Don't misuse it. Just leave the rest of us
out of it.

It's interesting that the link Kirk Wolf posted:

     http://www.acronymfinder.com/USS.html

rates the incorrect

USS (Unix System Services) number six, and
USS (Unix Systems Services) number fourteen respectively.

Ummm. These are the same.


The
usage correct according to the IBM Glossary doesn't even make the
list.  And when I filter by Information Technology, USS (Unix
System Services) becomes number one, and USS (Unix Systems Services)
becomes number two.

the above are the same

  Now, I suspect that AcronymFinder hasn't an
army of gnomes researching and consulting authorities to verify that
USS (Unix System Services) or USS (Unix Systems Services)

the above are the same

is
technically correct.  More likely, they have a nest of spiders that
crawl the Web, and whenever they find constructs such as USS (Unix
System Services) or USS (Unix Systems Services)

the above are the same

they add weight
to the ranking of that interpretation.

When I want to understand an acronym, I rarely RTFM; more often
I simply type the acronym in a Google search box, and take
whatever appears in the first page of hits as conventional,
although possibly technically incorrect.  So Chris Mason's
polemics are likely counterproductive of his end: the more
stridently he denies that USS stands for Unix System Services, or
that USS stands for Unix Systems Services

the above are the same

, provoking followups
that sometimes quote him, the higher he boosts the construct he
detests in AcronymFinder's ratings.

He'd more effectively further his cause of eliminating use of
USS (Unix System Services) and USS (Unix Systems Services)

the above are the same


if
he'd simply STFU.  (AcronymFinder gets that one almost right.)

-- gil

???

--

Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

* To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
  + Training your people is an excellent investment

* Try our new tool for calculating your Return On Investment
    for training dollars at
  http://www.trainersfriend.com/ROI/roi.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to