On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Gainsford, Allen <[email protected]> wrote: <deleted> > then, if STEPA abends with U111, STEPB will execute. But if STEPB also > abends, then STEPC and STEPD will still execute, even though they're not the > subject of the IF. I want a way to force STEPC and STEPD to be flushed if > STEPB abends. > > The only way I've found so far is to surround STEPC and STEPD with their own > IF statements, so that STEPC only runs if STEPB explicitly ran and did not > abend, and STEPD only runs if STEPC explicitly ran and did not abend. This > is long-winded, tedious, and over-complex. But so far I haven't been able to > find another way. > > Regards, > Allen
3 different sets of conditions, 3 different IFs. If the desired combinations are just right, nesting IFs might do it, but not with your desired results. -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
