In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/19/2005
at 05:45 PM, Frank Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Apparently they made some statement of direction about this last
?year, but then who takes those things seriously.
The prudent.
>It's sort of like when IBM responds to a SHARE
>requirement with the words "future design consideration" --- you just
>don't believe it is really going to happen.
Why? I know of one that IBM implemented after rejecting it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
