In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/22/2005
at 05:53 PM, "R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I have to admit, this is pure theoretical problem. Even 60x160 is eye
> torture (at least on my 'small' 19" screen).
I found 62x160 to be readable on a 17" panel.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
