I'll post laster. I am running jobs that are using these tapes. The PP (no comments please) was showing me I was asking for 2006. I tried both 2 digit & 4 digit years.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R. Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 12:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: RMF Post Processor Problem Dean, what was the output from the PP as far as parameters? That should tell you what the problem is. I ran into this exact thing a couple weeks ago and the dates that the PP were using were 1906 rather than 2006. Did you try 4 digit years? Rex That didn't work either. The manual says both formats will work. If I run it for the full week, I get the dates I requested. I have run this successfully before ??? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
