In article 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John) wrote:

> If the "ftp processor" has a problem, then the "ftp team"
> would be alerted that an ftp failed. The "ftp team" would be able to
> look at the ftp output and hopefully determine what failed, why, and
> then fix it. This would releave the normal programmers from being
> called. These people: (1) don't have the authority on the ftp server to
> see what the problem might be, if the problem is there; (2) don't know
> how to determine if the problem is on the server or the z/OS side; (3)
> don't want to be responsible for ftp processing at all.

How about just changing the documentation for the job to say that if it 
fails in the ftp step, to call the ftp team instead of the normal 
programmers?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to