On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:34:37 -0600, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hum, that is actually a fairly good idea. Now, to see if our Production >Control people can implement it. The reason that I say that is that each >support group's jobs start with a specific prefix. So Prod Control looks >at the first 4 characters of the job which "failed" and call that group. >I don't think that they actually refer to any external documentation on >the job to determine who to call. So the apps person would get called, >look at the job, see that it was the ftp step, then ask that the "ftp >team" be called instead. The apps people would like to avoid being woken >up just to determine "not my problem." That I can well understand! > Split the job in two then. The apps people who don't want to be called may be willing to do that work. Also scheduling work to set up the triggers. What about adding an SMTP step? Or did I miss your response? Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
