>Yes, but .... While IBM has been preaching 32760 for loadlibs and system- >determined blocksizes for other libraries, it has also been churning out some Program Directories that have not been rewritten for decades, with BLKSIZE= >6144 for loadlibs, 3200 for LRECL=80 datasets, etc. And some people are afraid to go against Program Directories, even when the info is against the >latest recommendations elsewhere; even when the info is obviously obsolete.
Why should this be considered obsolete? Why does anyone really care? What is the supposed benefit of 32760 over 6144? Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
