Tom,
I was not picking on you. I was trying to get the thread back on
track. I was curious about the correct answer to the question and did
not feel that the thread was going anywhere. After my post(not because
of it, mind you), I saw some superb posts that laid all of the
difficulties out, including some useful alternatives. I apologize if I
offended you in any way.
Steve A.
Tom Schmidt wrote:
Steve,
The answer to his question was no. I expanded on some issues he could
expect to find - some sooner, some later. He also ought to expect issues
with error recovery (although I'm on a system that IS currently supported
and we found a very new issue with error recovery just last week... but the
difference is that we CAN expect to see a fix sometime relatively soon).
Your post didn't enlighten the user's original request either, it merely
took my answers to task. I didn't make assumptions on his Y2K concerns,
nor did I make the leap of faith that "he has the license". If he is
running his "MVS/SP 3.2.2" system now (which I doubt) then he is trying to
mix old (presumably cheap) software with newer, less expensive hardware...
I would expect some fallout to come from that combination.
Maybe the O.P. will explain his "MVS/SP 3.2.2" designation better. Is is
really MVS/ESA 3.1.3 + DFP 3.2, or is it something different?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
