On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:17 PM, John Eells wrote:
-----------------------SNIP-----------------------------------
There have been formal requests, all of which have been rejected.
Feel free to submit another one, of course.
John,
Indeed there have been and like you said rejected. I am not sure
there was a reason for the rejection. If SHARE was doing their job
they should have sent it back requesting a reason, IMO.
I think a well written request with a parmlib option might get
somewhere though. I will stand by my original guess is that IBM does
have a sound reason they just don't want to say. It my open an
integrity loophole (example only and a guess ONLY). Still, it would
have been nice *IF* that was the case to say so and I do think the
matter would be dropped.
Ed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
