On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:33:33 EDT, IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
>In a message dated 6/20/2006 9:12:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>>I thought that todays disks have more capacity on the  outer
>>tracks than on the inner ones. Transfer rates vary with  the
>>track position being read or written to.
>
>Transfer rates from the disk into the read/write transducer do indeed  vary
>depending on where the track is, but then the data is slowed down or  
speeded
>up as needed by the controller's microcircuits and by buffering so  that 
data
>transfer to or from the channel is at a consistent  rate.
>
>
>Today's disks are not different from yesterday's disks in this  regard.  

Yes, they are.  The old SLEDs were built with large diameter disks
and only a narrow band contained all the tracks.  Every track had the
same capacity, and the transfer rate remained constant.

>The
>circumference of the outermost concentric circle is always  larger than 
that
>of the innermost concentric circle.  In the extreme  case, the 
circumference of
>any circle is pi*diameter, and the circumference at  its center is 0.  Data
>is recorded on tracks at X number of bytes per  linear inch.  No two tracks
>have exactly the same number of linear  inches.  The engineers who design 
the
>disks, read/write transducers, and  control units take this into 
consideration.

On a 3390, the inner tracks and outer tracks were only about two inches
apart.  The electronics transferred the data to all tracks at the same
rate, with the result that the data on the outer tracks was recorded at
a slightly lower bit density.

>The control unit will  transfer data to or from the channel at a rate no
>higher than the channel's  maximum transfer rate regardless of how many 
bytes are
>on the track or how  fast the disk is spinning.  Controllers these days 
also

Disk drives have device level buffers, and control units (not the same
thing as controllers) have additional buffers.

>have device-level  buffers, so even if the disk is spinning too slowly the 
data
>transfer rate  from the buffer to the channel can still take place at the
>channel's maximum  rate.
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to