Still not enough information, Ted. There are many options available. Just knowing the capacity is a little like only knowing how many engines you have on your processor. There are other important variables.
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>All this is speculation, though, because Ted didn't tell us what drives are in the "Old EMC" or in the "Latest and greatest." > >The old are 46? I think. What was popular 3 years ago? >The new are going to be 73, unless I get 'proof' that 146 will perform. >(64 GB Cache). > >Our out-sourcer hates to be second guessed and my management doesn't understand enough to back me up. > >. >-teD > >Marching to the beat of a different flute > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html >========================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
