>Will the ETDEAM bit support be retrofitted to earlier >z/OS levels? The earlier the better for me.
As with almost everything considered for retrofitting, it would likely require a significant business case to make it happen, unless it was documented that it worked (i.e., documented to work, but did not work) in which case an APAR would be considered. Dare one ask what's the big deal? Can't you just place SAM64 as the first instruction of your PC routine and get the same affect (aside from the additional cycle(s) for the instruction)? Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
