On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 09:46 -0400, Daniel A. McLaughlin wrote: > Almost sounds as if there ought to be two flavors of ZVM - heavy duty > where it's used for more than a hypervisor as in our case where we have a > client who uses it with NOMAD; and a light ZVM for containing multiple > images of LINUX. > > As for the latter, it could almost be a black box operation. Install it, > drive your LINUX farm, and never really mess with it otherwise.
When IBM jumped on the Linux bandwagon they floated such a scenario, and appeared to be trying to kill the full product VM as "collateral damage". Given the fiasco it was, that product was quietly killed, and z/VM became the fantastic marketing "golden child" we must all now believe in. Cynicism, what cynicism ???... Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
