In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/20/2006
at 09:35 AM, Bob Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Dave - I would argue that there is no implied security for authorized
>code.
The Devil is in the details. If the user of an authorized service
causes a security breach, then that is not APARable against that
service. But if the correct use of the service causes a security
breach then that should be APARable.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
