You need 160 columns if you want 32 bytes per row when displaying
storage using IPCS.
Edward Jaffe wrote:
I'm not sure why anyone wants to use 160 columns. AFAICT, the old 3290
supported this width simply because it was a convenient multiple of 80.
A 51x132 or 62x132 screen is much easier to read than 51x160 or 62x160
and equally effective for on-line reading of dumps, reports, etc.. Of
course, some people prefer 133 columns and I can't argue with their
rationale. But, IMHO 160 is just silly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
