In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/21/2006
at 11:18 AM, "Farley, Peter x23353" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Your eyes are obviously not presbyopic yet. Trying to read the font
>in which 62x132 displays on a 14" laptop screen is actually hurtful,
Then don't use a 14" laptop.
>And it's not a whole lot
>easier on a 17" second monitor, either.
I had no trouble reading 62x132 on the 3290, which is 17", nor reading
two columns of 62x80.
>Unless you've got one of those humongous 30" flatscreens for your
>monitor and you run it fullscreen, 62x132 is just not very
>productive for old eyes like mine.
If I had a 30" monitor I'd want a lot more than 960 characters
displayed on it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
