On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:22:10 -0500, Ward, Mike S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is SMS active on your 1.7 system? >That's just it the system doesn't complain about the unit= parameter. I >can use unit=xxxyyx even if it's not an esoteric. What I'm trying to >find out is where in the operating environment is this allowed. I may >have an sms ACL error or possibly a jcl user exit that's not coded >correctly. I'm asking these questions because I don't necessarily know >where to look first. > >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Tom Marchant >Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 3:17 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: unit=sort > >On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:03:41 -0500, Ward, Mike S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >>Hello, all. A bit more investigation is showing that I can use any >entry >>in the unit field and the system accepts it. I can use unit=sort, >>unit=mike, unit=ward, etc... Does this mean that I have an ACL that is >>allowing this. Or should I be looking for a user exit the replaces the >>unit parameter? Anyone have a guess? I didn't think sms got involved >>until the interpreter did its job. And then it should have crapped out >>during the interpreter read phase. >> >I'm confused. > >"...until the interpreter did its job." If the interpreter hadn't done >it's job, who is complaining about the unit? > >What message are you getting? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
