-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Russell Witt
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Non-SMP/e packaging

I had a request from a client today, asking when CA-1 would stop being
delivered in SMP/e format and would be a simple library-download. From
my
other talks with clients, I thought everyone wanted products delivered
in
SMP/e format. And this was the first time I had seen a request to go
backwards to simply giving people a loadlib that they could refresh on a
monthly/quarterly basis as required. This client pointed to a number of
other products that do not use SMP/e and he felt SMP/e way to cumbersome
to
deal with (obviously, he was in charge of OEM products and not
maintenance
to the operating system itself). Still, I have to ask, would clients
prefer
to have an optional non-SMP/e installation procedure even when it means
having to download a fresh copy of the product in order to apply
maintenance?
<snip>

Perhaps what you should do is have a survey done of your client base and
ask them.

But going back a few weeks, there was a discussion about this very
thing. Boole & Babbage used to provide (for AutoOPERATOR at least) two
tapes. The first was the load and go. The remainder and onto the second
tape was all the SMP/E files related to that load and go install. It was
entirely the customer's choice to only lay down the executables and
never put down the backing SMP/E files (basically, the SMP/E install was
a copy of the install that was done at ole Drool & Babble that had been
backed up to tape - everything was there).

Customers could choose to re-order the system, and they would get it
again, with all the maint already on it (all you had to do was wait
until a "PUT" was produced and then order it - what you got was the
customer install system with the PUT already applied).

As I recall (this was up to 1993), we had customers who never installed
the SMP/E components but only laid down the target files. One might
wonder why they would do it that way when some HIPER maint might come
out that they absolutely had to have (and yes, that happened a few times
too).

But, if the customers want things simple, and don't want to take up the
space, and you allow them to let you do all their maint and then ship it
to them to just lay down... Well, you might be able to market this and
have a charge for it.

Later,
Steve Thompson

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to