In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/14/2006
at 11:56 AM, Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Seymour, are you suggesting that he abandon his long term practice of
> providing maintenance as zaps just to be more SMP-friendly?
I'm suggesting that
1. He be honest about the RESTORE requirement coming from his use
of zaps
2. The use of zaps causes an unnecessary exposure.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
