On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:39:58 +0000, john gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> > >recommendation and your own CONTROLINTERVALSIZE(26624) value, I would change > > RECORDSIZE(26614,32767) > >which may be an old typo, to > > RECORDSIZE(26624,32767) > Not a typo today, but I'm not enough of a VSAM expert to say if there is any real reason why the avg recordsize is less than the CISIZE specification. I'm pretty sure I originally got those numbers from Cheryl Watson or a CMG paper. I also found those same specifications in this Redbook: System/390 MVS Parallel Sysplex Continuous Availability SE Guide SG24-4503-00 Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - GITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
