> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder
>
> IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote on
> 01/29/2007 09:08:47 AM:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder
> > >
> > > [ snip ]
> > >
> > > If you are on z/OS 1.7 or higher, you can tell if the system was
> > > quiesced for a particular dump using IPCS:
> > >
> > > VERBX IEAVTSFS
> > >
> > > System reset dispatchable 09/17/2042 23:53:47.370496
> > > System was nondispatchable 00:00:00.000000
> > >
> > > indicates that the system was quiesced. (And yes, IEAVTSFS could
> > > check for a timestamp of zeroes and format something more
> sensible
> > > than 09/19/2042).
> > >
> > > System reset dispatchable 01/29/2007 00:25:24.261297
> > > System was nondispatchable 00:00:00.444675
> > >
> > > is an example where the system was quiesced.
> >
> > I presume the second instance is where you meant to write "... NOT
> > quiesced."
>
> No matter how many times I proofread before posting, I still
> can't seem to find all the typos.
Yeh.... I misspelled "first" myself. :-(
> The first instance should have said "not quiesced". That
> is, if the timestamp is 09/17/2042 and "System was nondispatchable"
> is 00:00:00.000000, then the system was not quiesced.
>
> Otherwise, "System was nondispatchable" represents the
> amount of elapsed time for which the system was quiesced.
>
> Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
