> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Eells > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:09 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Who uses IEE899I for Automation? > > > Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for > automation? If so, how big a deal would it be to change it (for > example, if we were to change the message ID and format of the > response)? > > -- > John Eells
I use it because we sometimes have TN3270E consoles "back up" due to undeletable messages in RD mode. If any console gets more that 200 messages, automation does a K Q,L=consid to remove them. Changing the information would be OK as long as I know what the new message looks like. This is the problem endemic to "message scraping". As an aside, is there some better way to do this? I'm on z/OS 1.6, possibly going to 1.8 3Q. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
