>(S.C.) I chose MVI rather than OI because I don't know the hmmhh... I fixed a lot of such coding technics after AMODE31 comes alive.
Roland -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerhard Postpischil Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 1:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Need help with Assembler accessing VSAM file in reentrant LE-conforming program Peter Relson wrote: > This is a very bad idea. The interface to services documented by macro > is the macro. If you "do it yourself" all bets are off. In forty-odd years on 360s and later machines, I've had to do a lot of things that weren't pretty, Most notably spending two or three weeks trying to sandwich a few instructions into an SVC overlay so it would still fit into a transient area. (S.C.) I chose MVI rather than OI because I don't know the initialization status of the DSECT, and it's an input file, so MVI was safe, whereas OI is iffy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
