Bob Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, in part: >1. Amdahl and TIDA is AFH.
AFH? Another ****ing Hamster? >3. FLEX-ES is alleged to have violated its agreement with IBM. No one >will ever know what action IBM would have taken had FLEX-ES not >partnered with PSI. I've heard no such allegation of a violation of Funsoft/IBM agreements -- please provide support? And Fundamental didn't partner with PSI -- T3 Technologies did. That's a very different kettle of fish, and in no way relates to FunSoft's agreements with IBM. Please correct this misapprehension. ...phsiii (Writing from a position of being 99.44% sure of what he's saying, but always willing to be proven wrong) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
