If Cobol is truly alive, why doesn't the 3.4.1 compiler support the "new" relative addressing and immediate instructions? Do we have to wait for Cobol 4?
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote on 04/18/2007 02:59:09 PM: > Discussions are already "ongoing" as to whether we need to/should submit a > LNGC project SHARE requirement on either Decimal Floating point or zAPP/zIIP > eligible XML support for COBOL. > I'll keep this list informed when/if such requirements are ready for > "discussion" > P.S. My *personal* hope is that both of these are 'far enough along" within > IBM so that we (users) don't have to tell them to do so. ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this communication (including any attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. The information may also constitute a legally privileged confidential communication. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
