On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:10:23 -0500, Brian Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is an excellent point. I've not heard any written or verbal statement >regarding the service objective for RECEIVE ORDER processing. Personally, I >feel the 120 minute timeout is reasonable. > >Brian > For "normal" orders, yes. But I still want (really need) a way to get a PTF or few PTFs very quickly if I run into a problem during a change window. 2 hours won't cut it with possible IPLs, testing, etc. Either the back end has to be smart enough to get the small orders done quickly, or I need something ala SRD "emergency" processing added into the RECEIVE ORDER function. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group: G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
