> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:55:50 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
> >
> >E) Explain why a z900 would be a *downgrade* from a z890.
>
> Sure, the z900 is a bit older technology, but how do you
> figure that it would be a downgrade? Especially with the
> "addition of 6 new CPUs"?
General principle is that replacing newer technology with older is "by
definition" a "downgrade".
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
