You should be able to protect it with the RACF PROGRAM class????? Phil Kingston z/OS Systems Programming Consultant Website www.zostek.com
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould Sent: 25 July 2007 19:00 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Secure clist On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Phil Kingston wrote: > Then should you not protect ICKDSF itself? How... at the time there was no security bult into ICKDSF. > > If your authorised to run it in batch, then why not through TSO. They weren't authorized to run it in batch. > > Protect ICKDSF from unauthorised users rather than execs? without writing exit code it was impossible, AFAIK. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
