On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:04:17 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... >... Again >came the reply that this was the design of the msgid filter and the >design was not going to be changed, period. ... For a long time it was (and I assume still is) IBM's policy that APARs are reports of "code defects" where the code does not correctly implement the design. There was no such thing as a "design defect". No matter how flawed the design, changing the design was viewed as an enhancement. "Broken as Designed" was not an APARable condition. Luckily, some support teams are willing to bend that rule if the flaw is really obvious. It helps if desired behavior matches documented behavior. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
