That Max is the only reader of these papers at this site? Sounds like it. I think Tom mis-read it.
Personally I'd start by working WLM from top down, with regards to importance, to try to make sense of the situation. If WLM is just spinning its wheels due to unobtainable goals that could be just the start of the problems. Setting realistic goals may help Max see where the pain really is. Dave Kopischke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> 09/20/2007 12:16 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject Re: WLC, WLM and all the rest: how optimize them ? to Steve Samson On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:12:12 -0500, Kelman, Tom wrote: >> >> Hi Steve and thank you a lot for your replies. I read (I think most of >) >> your papers and I find them very precise and useful. Unluckily here >I'm >> the only reader of them. >> >> >> Max Scarpa >> >Beg your pardon, but I have read Steve's excellent papers and his book >(both the older hard copy and the newer one on CD) and I would bet there >are many posters on this board that have read them and papers by other >WLM specialists such as Peter Enrico. > We may be misunderstanding the posters intended meaning on this one: "Unluckily HERE I'm the only reader of them." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
