I could differ with your statement "...and Windows is better than OS/2". I had an OS/2 system that supported a P/370 card that ran VM/ESA which supported local and dial-in lines on a 3174 that went over 2-1/2 years before it had a scheduled re-boot...
Charles S. Kammer -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 10:08 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: PL/S ?? On 1 Nov 2007 16:22:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick O'Keefe) wrote: >FSVO "better", I guess. I assume XL C/C++ is better than PL/X >like C/C++ is better than PL/I. And Windows is better than OS/2. > >I *liked* PL/I. Oh, well. C++ can't be as good as B-. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
