On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 22:21:55 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Add to that IODF changes requiring PORs > >There aren't many of those left, these days. >... We seem to have run into them, though. We've gone through a series of datacenter moves and processor reconfigurations. We had a number of PORs. Sometimes it was because of unanticipated shuffling of LPARs. (We can't afford to have *those* 2 LPARS on the same processor any more.) Sometimes it was because of some mismatches that prevented dynamic changes. (I'm not directly involved so I didn't here the details of that one. Right now we've got another POR scheduled because a couple CTC CU's were defined with just one device instead the intended number - 4 on one CU and 8 on another, I think. I have no idea why that requires a POR, but apparently it does. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
