> I have heard of other products that do this sort of thing - however > it makes me feel uneasy and personally I would try to avoid it. Your > program that sneaked in that CADS is never going to be above > suspicion for any system problems when an IPCS dump reveals it > looking like some huge zit on *MASTER*'s nose. > > A "CADS-owning" started task is probably less than 300 lines of > assembler and probably less complex (and *much* safer) that shooting > an SRB in *MASTER*.
Agree wholeheartedly - even for a "one-off". Add some messages to say it's started o.k.; make it look like the code is worthwhile .... ;-) Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html