> I have heard of other products that do this sort of thing - however 
> it makes me feel uneasy and personally I would try to avoid it. Your
> program that sneaked in that CADS is never going to be above 
> suspicion for any system problems when an IPCS dump reveals it 
> looking like some huge zit on *MASTER*'s nose.
> 
> A "CADS-owning" started task is probably less than 300 lines of 
> assembler and probably less complex (and *much* safer) that shooting
> an SRB in *MASTER*.

Agree wholeheartedly - even for a "one-off". Add some messages to say it's 
started o.k.; make it look like the code is worthwhile  ....   ;-)

Shane ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to