Roland, While the SRB to MASTER approach may be taken by a number of IBM products (DB2 and RACF come to mind), for a vendor product, I would have to agree with Rob and Shane, do it the right way, if only to save yourself having to deal with calls from IBM if there is an abend in the MASTER address space, and your code is in there.
Wayne Driscoll Product Developer JME Software LLC NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Schiradin Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Common Dataspace Hi, I have an application which require a common dataspace. Not a big issue so far but I don't want to start/write a STC just to hold the CADS so I schedule a SRB to *MASTER* and create the CADS undercover for this ASID. This works also and I also provide a utility to delete this dataspace. Someone ask me if this is allowed and I wonder I found nothing which tells me a clear YES or NO. What did you think? Regards Roland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
