Martin and John, I understand and agree with what your responses, and "celebration" is possibly an over-statement. Half the battle, at times, is getting acknowledgement from a vendor that an issue really is an issue, and not just customer whining.
Not that we ever have that here, of course. Cheers,,,Steve Steve Conway Lead Systems Programmer Information Systems & Services Division Computer & Network Operations Phone: (703) 450-3156 Fax: (703) 450-3197 John Eells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> 12/14/2007 08:25 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject Re: Virtual Storage Controls - Was Re: REGION=0M and LSQA Steven Conway wrote: > I agree with CC that having jobs blow due to limited storage is archaic. > John's suggestion of a "warn mode" is outstanding. And, it's heartening > for Martin to tell us people within IBM are looking at this issue. <snip> I hate to make this my last post before the holidays, so I suppose I'll have to find something else to post about later today. But celebration for this particular reason seems premature; as far as I know nothing is in plan to address this yet. As always, interested parties should consider submitting a requirement. -- John Eells z/OS Technical Marketing IBM Poughkeepsie [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
