In a message dated 12/17/2007 9:50:22 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's no point in implementing code that will have multiple outstanding EXCPs, greatly increasing the complexity, if all that's going to happen is that they are going to be executed serially anyhow. Thus my attempt to understand EXCP queuing and PAV. Is it worth adding complexity that sometimes would not help, depending on the hardware configuration and UCB definitions, and other times would run in 1/10 the elapsed time? Add code to look for hardware/software options and, if they are there, then exploit the hell out of them. Which would mean having more than one outstanding EXCP that your complex code would have to keep track of. Bill Fairchild Franklin, TN **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
