> We have a 2109-800 I think, and the reason we never implemented PAV's, > was because we have a mainly "batch" workload, and the main benefit of > PAV's is apparently on multiple reads. Is this still the case?
It was never the case. It's for multiple I/O's, regardless of the type. Check out your IOSQ. If it's too high, then you may benefit from PAV. But, you have to define 'high'. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
