On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:34:34 -0600, Andy Wood wrote: > >The question of where to stash something arose in this thread when it was >suggested that storage could be acquired once, and not every time the >function was called. In that context name/token has a complication - the last >time I looked, simply calling the name/token services needed some writeable >storage to create the parameter list, which is a bit tricky if you don't yet >know where your working storage is. > >I can think of ways to do it, but none that I would be really happy with. > >Not that that makes TCBUSER a better choice. I think I would stick to simply >obtaining and releasing the storage each time the function was called. > I guess we're just lucky there's a form of GETMAIN that requires no writeable storage.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
