On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:34:34 -0600 Andy Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:27:56 -0600, Paul Gilmartin :><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :>>Name/token sounds like a better choice, even though it's innovative. :>The question of where to stash something arose in this thread when it was :>suggested that storage could be acquired once, and not every time the :>function was called. In that context name/token has a complication - the last :>time I looked, simply calling the name/token services needed some writeable :>storage to create the parameter list, which is a bit tricky if you don't yet :>know where your working storage is. :>I can think of ways to do it, but none that I would be really happy with. The poor mans way. Load a reusable module and store the address in it. -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
