On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:09:46 -0500, Mark Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I use the same SMPE procedure to run the RECEIVE and then the APPLY. If >the level of SMPE in the steplib'd MIGLIB is different than the level of >SMPE in production the RECEIVE fails as I described earlier but the >steplib is needed for the APPLY. Using the same procedure for both >functions is a catch22. > >My solution is to have a separate procedure (without the steplib) for >the receive and a procedure with the steplib for everything else. > >But I agree that it would be a good thing for SMPE to come up with a >method of making it more idiot proof. > During migration - until all systems are at the new level, you should be able to use the STEPLIB job and point your classpath in your client DD to your service directory for the uplevel system (obviously the uplevel root needs to be mounted). Then you can use the same procedure for everything: classpath="/service/usr/lpp/smp/classes/" Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
