On Jan 12, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
I use the same SMPE procedure to run the RECEIVE and then the
APPLY. If
the level of SMPE in the steplib'd MIGLIB is different than the
level of
SMPE in production the RECEIVE fails as I described earlier but the
steplib is needed for the APPLY. Using the same procedure for both
functions is a catch22.
My solution is to have a separate procedure (without the steplib) for
the receive and a procedure with the steplib for everything else.
But I agree that it would be a good thing for SMPE to come up with a
method of making it more idiot proof.
Mark Jacobs
Mark,
IBM should have an INFO APAR (IMO) to cover this you should bug them
for one.
Ed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html