I checked, no. I skimmed through the syslog and I found 50 (so far) were allocated by batch jobs.
Ulrich Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it possible that these 93 datasets "appeared" on these volumes as a result of DFHSM RECALLs? Regards, Ulrich Krueger -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 08:19 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION - DISKS STILL BEING ALLOCATED I noticed that 93 datasets were created on these volumes from Mar 01 to Mar 03. I did the DISNEW on Feb 28. "Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM" wrote: John, The result of your method and the online V SMS commands are the same. What exactly do you mean with "new dsns are still being allocated"? DISNEW means that no new datasets should be created on the volumes, existing datasets can still be allocated by starting jobs of tasks. Kees. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html --------------------------------- Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
