On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:53:44 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I'd like to see that, because I recall reading parallel sysplex test reports that showed an increase. > >I'll hunt for the reference, but I'm not sure what you mean. >SYSPLEX overhead goes up, or overhead goes up because you implemented SYSPLEX? >The second is obvious. > The (former) parallel sysplex test reports weren't about migrating to parallel sysplex. http://www-304.ibm.com/jct03004c/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/integtst/library.html Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
