On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:40:36 -0500, Walt Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:46:35 -0700, Edward Jaffe ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>...snipped... >>This has nothing to do with anything said in the 1990s. It is a much >>more recent initiative that has been articulated verbally to ISVs, >>customers at at SHARE, and in other places. It is not a formal promise >>to anyone. It is an internal objective. So far, it's working. > >I wonder if there is some confusion about what "a 5% decrease in utilization >per release" means? Was that intended to indicate a performance improvement >or degredation? To try to clarify that question a bit: I think -I- know what we're trying to do, but I'm not sure everyone on the list is interpreting that "5% decrease" in the same way. Or maybe it was just Ted (sorry, Ted :-) who confused me. -- Walt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
