On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:52:52 -0500, Mark Zelden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I want to make sure I have these 2 points correct...
>
>For a planned removal (V XCF,sysname,offline) in a parallel sysplex OR basic
>sysplex, you will not see IXC102A if you have an active and properly
configured
>SFM policy.
Not quite. As I noted, isolation requires that you have a CF connected to
both the target system and some other system from which isolation can be
initiated. A basic sysplex does not meet this requirement, so in a planned
removal you will see IXC102A.
>
>For an unplanned removal, you will see IXC102A regardless of any SFM
>policy in a basic sysplex but may not see it in a parallel sysplex depending
>on your SFM policy.
Again, not quite. Even in a basic sysplex, if the SFM policy specifies
DEACTTIME or RESETTIME for the outgoing system, another system on the
same CPC can initiate the specified action. Either of those has the desired
effect of terminating I/O from the outgoing system, so IXC102A would not be
issued.
Bill Neiman
XCF Development
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
